Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
2.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 105(2): 363-367, 2021 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1374605

ABSTRACT

The risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and dengue coinfection is increased in tropical countries; however, the extrapulmonary clinical manifestations have not been fully characterized. We report a 42-year-old woman whose clinical manifestations began with fever, diarrhea, headache, chest pain, myalgia, odynophagia, and arthralgia. Despite mild respiratory symptoms and normal chest computed tomography scan results, she was diagnosed with real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Because she had erythema and petechiae with a decreased platelet count, the dengue NS1 antigen and anti-dengue IgM/IgG test were performed, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention RT-PCR assay detected the dengue virus serotype 1 infection. Additionally, increased liver enzyme serum levels were found in the patient, who later developed hepatomegaly. Hence, the mechanism of hepatic pathology associated with SARS-CoV-2 and dengue coinfection needs further research.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Coinfection/complications , Coinfection/diagnosis , Dengue/complications , Dengue/diagnosis , Adult , COVID-19/diagnosis , Coinfection/virology , Female , Fever , Hematology/methods , Humans , Lost to Follow-Up , SARS-CoV-2/classification , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Serogroup , Thorax/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
3.
Pharmacol Res ; 157: 104866, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1318930

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 is a medical emergency, with 20 % of patients presenting with severe clinical manifestations. From the pathogenetic point of view, COVID-19 mimics two other well-known diseases characterized by cytokine storm and hyper-activation of the immune response, with consequent organ damage: acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Hematologists are confident with these situations requiring a prompt therapeutic approach for switching off the uncontrolled cytokine release; here, we discuss pros and cons of drugs that are already employed in hematology in the light of their possible application in COVID-19. The most promising drugs might be: Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, with a rapid and powerful anti-cytokine effect, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with their good anti-inflammatory properties, and perhaps the anti-Cd26 antibody Begelomab. We also present immunological data from gene expression experiments where TKIs resulted effective anti-inflammatory and pro-immune drugs. A possible combined treatment algorithm for COVID-19 is here proposed.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Hematology/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , COVID-19 , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Humans , Macrophage Activation Syndrome/drug therapy , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Adv Sci (Weinh) ; 8(18): e2100323, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1316190

ABSTRACT

Blood cell analysis is a major pillar of biomedical research and healthcare. These analyses are performed in central laboratories. Rapid shipment from collection site to the central laboratories is currently needed because cells and biomarkers degrade rapidly. The dried blood spot from a fingerstick allows the preservation of cellular molecules for months but entire cells are never recovered. Here leucocyte elution is optimized from dried blood spots. Flow cytometry and mRNA expression profiling are used to analyze the recovered cells. 50-70% of the leucocytes that are dried on a polyester solid support via elution after shaking the support with buffer are recovered. While red blood cells lyse upon drying, it is found that the majority of leucocytes are preserved. Leucocytes have an altered structure that is improved by adding fixative in the elution buffer. Leucocytes are permeabilized, allowing an easy staining of all cellular compartments. Common immunophenotyping and mRNAs are preserved. The ability of a new biomarker (CD169) to discriminate between patients with and without Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome induced by Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections is also preserved. Leucocytes from blood can be dried, shipped, and/or stored for at least 1 month, then recovered for a wide variety of analyses, potentially facilitating biomedical applications worldwide.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/diagnosis , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Dried Blood Spot Testing/methods , Hematology/methods , Immunophenotyping/methods , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Specimen Collection/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Cell Separation/methods , Communicable Diseases/virology , Erythrocytes/virology , Flow Cytometry/methods , Humans , Leukocytes/virology , RNA, Messenger/blood , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
6.
Int J Lab Hematol ; 43(2): 160-168, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-954105

ABSTRACT

In December 2019, a new type of coronavirus was detected for the first time in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. According to the reported data, the emerging coronavirus has spread worldwide, infecting more than fifty-seven million individuals, leading to more than one million deaths. The current study aimed to review and discuss the hematological findings of COVID-19. Laboratory changes and hematologic abnormalities have been reported repeatedly in COVID-19 patients. WBC count and peripheral blood lymphocytes are normal or slightly reduced while these indicators may change with the progression of the disease. In addition, several studies demonstrated that decreased hemoglobin levels in COVID-19 patients were associated with the severity of the disease. Moreover, thrombocytopenia, which is reported in 5%-40% of patients, is known to be associated with poor prognosis of the disease. COVID-19 can present with various hematologic manifestations. In this regard, accurate evaluation of laboratory indicators at the beginning and during COVID-19 can help physicians to adjust appropriate treatment and provide special and prompt care for those in need.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hematology/methods , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2/genetics , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2/immunology , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Platelets/immunology , Blood Platelets/pathology , Blood Platelets/virology , COVID-19/pathology , COVID-19/virology , China/epidemiology , Erythrocytes/immunology , Erythrocytes/pathology , Erythrocytes/virology , Hematology/instrumentation , Humans , Laboratories , Leukocytes/immunology , Leukocytes/pathology , Leukocytes/virology , Receptors, Virus/genetics , Receptors, Virus/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Serine Endopeptidases/genetics , Serine Endopeptidases/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/genetics , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Virus Internalization
7.
Int J Lab Hematol ; 43(2): 148-159, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-919216

ABSTRACT

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound worldwide impact on the laboratory hematology community. Nevertheless, the pace of COVID-19 hematology-related research has continued to accelerate and has established the role of laboratory hematology data for many purposes including disease prognosis and outcome. The purpose of this scoping review was to assess the current state of COVID-19 laboratory hematology research. A comprehensive search of the literature published between December 1, 2019, and July 3, 2020, was performed, and we analyzed the sources, publication dates, study types, and topics of the retrieved studies. Overall, 402 studies were included in this scoping review. Approximately half of these studies (n = 202, 50.37%) originated in China. Retrospective cohort studies comprised the largest study type (n = 176, 43.89%). Prognosis/ risk factors, epidemiology, and coagulation were the most common topics. The number of studies published per day has increased through the end of May. The studies were heavily biased in favor of papers originating in China and on retrospective clinical studies with limited use of and reporting of laboratory data. Despite the major improvements in our understanding of the role of coagulation, automated hematology, and cell morphology in COVID-19, there are gaps in the literature, including biosafety and the laboratory role in screening and prevention of COVID-19. There is a gap in the publication of papers focused on guidelines for the laboratory. Our findings suggest that, despite the large number of publications related to laboratory data and their use in COVID-19 disease, many areas remain unexplored or under-reported.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hematology/methods , Laboratories/organization & administration , Pandemics , Bibliometrics , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Cell Count , Blood Coagulation Factors/metabolism , Blood Coagulation Tests , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/virology , China/epidemiology , Europe/epidemiology , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Hematology/instrumentation , Humans , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Severity of Illness Index , United States/epidemiology
8.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 70(5): 349-354, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-642865

ABSTRACT

New York City has been at the epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that has already infected over a million people and resulted in more than 70,000 deaths as of early May 2020 in the United States alone. This rapid and enormous influx of patients into the health care system has had profound effects on all aspects of health care, including the care of patients with cancer. In this report, the authors highlight the transformation they underwent within the Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology as they prepared for the COVID-19 crisis in New York City. Under stressful and uncertain conditions, some of the many changes they enacted within their division included developing a regular line of communication among division leaders to ensure the development and implementation of a restructuring strategy, completely reconfiguring the inpatient and outpatient units, rapidly developing the ability to perform telemedicine video visits, and creating new COVID-rule-out and COVID-positive clinics for their patients. These changes allowed them to manage the storm while minimizing the disruption of important continuity of care to their patients with cancer. The authors hope that their experiences will be helpful to other oncology practices about to experience their own individual COVID-19 crises.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematology/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Oncology Service, Hospital/organization & administration , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Communication , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematology/methods , Humans , Medical Oncology/methods , New York City/epidemiology , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Isolation , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/organization & administration
10.
Int J Lab Hematol ; 42 Suppl 1: 11-18, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-602630

ABSTRACT

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic originated in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in December 2019. The etiologic agent is a novel coronavirus of presumed zoonotic origin with structural similarity to the viruses responsible for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). Like SARS and MERS, COVID-19 infection manifests most frequently with lower respiratory symptoms. A minority of patients progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome/ diffuse alveolar damage. In addition to its central role in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, the clinical laboratory provides critical information to clinicians regarding prognosis, disease course, and response to therapy. The purpose of this review is to (a) provide background context about the origins and course of the pandemic, (b) discuss the laboratory's role in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, (c) summarize the current state of biomarker analysis in COVID-19 infection, with an emphasis on markers derived from the hematology laboratory, (d) comment on the impact of COVID-19 on hematology laboratory safety, and (e) describe the impact the pandemic has had on organized national and international educational activities worldwide.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Clinical Laboratory Services/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Lymphopenia/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Thrombocytopenia/epidemiology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Biomarkers/blood , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , China/epidemiology , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Communicable Disease Control , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Hematology/methods , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Laboratories/organization & administration , Lymphopenia/diagnosis , Lymphopenia/physiopathology , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Procalcitonin/blood , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombocytopenia/diagnosis , Thrombocytopenia/physiopathology , United States/epidemiology , Viral Proteins/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL